Related%20passage for Bava Batra 296:14

הפקיר כל נכסיו מהו מי אמרינן כיון דאף לעניים כעשירים גמר ומקני או דלמא כל לגבי נפשיה לא גמר ומקני

and none of them should acquire ownership!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Owing to the fact that the testator in distributing his estate had left nothing for himself. ');">³⁷</span> And the law [is that] partial withdrawal is [considered] complete withdrawal. [Hence.] the first clause [of the Baraitha] may be applicable either [to the case] where he died or [to that] where he recovered:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The second donee acquires ownership because when the gift was given to him the testator (having withdrawn the gift from the first) was in possession of property. The first does not acquire ownership because the gift has been withdrawn from him in favour of the testator (if he recovers) or his heirs (if he dies). ');">³⁸</span> the final clause can only be applicable [to the case] where he recovered.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The first acquires ownership because when he was given the gift the testator was still in possession of some of his estate. The second does not acquire ownership because when the gift was given to him the testator had left for himself nothing. Had the testator died both would have acquired ownership. ');">³⁹</span>

Explore related%20passage for Bava Batra 296:14. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.